RED4SUS
Application Manual
- Implementation -
This section discusses the steps that follow the design of the solution and that actually constitute the effective implementation of the solution. Thus, topics related to implementation planning, actual implementation and monitoring of results after implementation are addressed, including any corrections that may be necessary.
PLANNING

Planning the implementation of projects involves care regarding the definition of scope, work packages, schedule, staff and infrastructure. These topics are discussed below.
​
Project scope
Implementation planning starts with a clear understanding of its scope. The scope of a project is the detailing of all the work necessary to deliver the “final product” within the expected specifications. If the scope of a product is to understand the characteristics it must have, the project scope involves mapping the work needed to establish these characteristics in the resulting product of the project. Therefore, first the product scope is defined and then the project scope is defined: you need to know WHAT needs to be done to define HOW it should be done. Proper definition of scope is important, as it implies better conditions for:
-
Mitigate impacts arising from errors that could negatively affect other areas of project management, such as cost, risk, quality and schedule management, for example.
-
Improve communication, as the scope must be documented and this document will guide the work, improving communication, as everyone is expected to know what will need to be done.
-
Reduce the risk of differences between what was requested and the end result.
-
Prevent changes being requested in the middle of the project due to inadequate planning. The further along a project is, the greater the costs associated with changes and delays.
To elaborate the project scope, the following activities are recommended:
-
Scope Management Planning: Involves planning and documenting how product and project scopes will be defined, controlled, and validated. To do so, project managers can use expert opinion, data analysis and meetings to develop the plan.
-
Requirements Gathering: refers to documenting and managing stakeholder needs and requirements in order to meet project objectives. Requirements must be documented in sufficient detail so that they are measurable and can be included in the scope baseline (time, cost and quality.)
-
Definition of the project scope: detailing all the work required to carry out the project. The main items that must be present in a scope statement are:
-
Identification
-
Project Scope Description: Details about each stage of the project. Some key items in this description are the start and end date, staff required for execution, and infrastructure required.
-
Project deliverables: description of each deliverable, objective, who is responsible, expected benefits, characteristics they must present.
-
Acceptance criteria: specification of expected standards upon delivery
-
-
Creation of the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS): organization in visual form of all the work to be done on the project. EAP is a subdivision of work into smaller parts, thus facilitating execution.
-
Project Scope Validation: Involves formalizing acceptance of project deliverables. This must occur whenever a delivery is completed and, if any of them is not accepted, changes will be requested.
-
Scope Control: Monitor scope progress and manage changes. This helps track work progress and change requests.
​​
Some common mistakes when developing project scope include:
-
Ignore project risks: the identification of risks must be carried out in the project and task planning, in order to reduce their impacts or even to avoid them. They must be listed in the project scope and the respective contingency actions must be included in the schedule.
-
Lack of communication: Lack of clear communication can occur in all spheres of stakeholder interaction, causing damage to the project and even to the final product.
-
Lack of technical knowledge: can lead to the scope not being well planned, creating the need for many changes.
Work Breackdown Structure - WBS
When starting the structuring and planning of the operational aspects of the project, one of the fundamental management elements is the definition of the Work Breakdown Structure. The WBS is the division of the project into manageable parts, representing the project deliverables in the form of a diagram. It is one of the most important Project Management tools, serving as a basis for the development of other project plans, such as schedule and costs. The WBS structure guarantees the project manager visibility of the main deliverables; defines the work required for the project; promotes a common view of the work to those involved and supports other project management processes, such as resource planning and risk identification. It should be noted that the WBS does not correspond to the schedule, as it does not list the definition of activities. Its last level of deployment is the work package, which, in turn, is a set of activities, usually assigned to a specific person, department, or sector. Work packages must be independent of each other and must not be repeated throughout the WBS.
As a characteristic, the WBS refers to the understanding of how to do it, while the schedule defines what to do, that is, the activities and their details. It is recommended that, before starting the definition of the WBS, the identification of the project requirements is carried out, aiming to define the characteristics of what will be delivered by the project. Basically, for the elaboration of the WBS, there are four strategies:
-
By phases: considers the phases of the project cycle.
-
By deliveries: considers the project's products.
-
By sub-projects: considers the “mini-projects” that make up the project.
-
Hybrid: by phases, deliverables and subprojects
​
Also, for the development of the WBS, it is recommended the deployment of up to three levels, namely:
-
Level 0: project product
-
Level 1: project phases
-
Level 2: components (work packages)
The unfolding process must use a numerical coding system that helps to identify and relate the hierarchy in the WBS, using the 3 levels of unfolding and the correct identification of the element at a given level. As an example: 1.1.2: shows that a certain element is a work package that is part of the WBS's third hierarchical level. Another important element is the so-called WBS Dictionary, which corresponds to a table describing work packages, those responsible for them and acceptance criteria. This is where expectations regarding the results of project deliverables are made explicit. It must contain the following items: 1) Work package with identification; 2) Description; 3) Responsible; 4) Participants and 5) Acceptance Criteria.
Schedule
A schedule is an activity planning and control tool that organizes the tasks to be performed in a certain period of time to reach a final objective. An important aspect is the time, which must be sequenced so that deliveries are made within the estimated or expected time. Creating a schedule is much more than distributing tasks over time. It needs to be executable, which requires alignment with other areas of project management and also with the team. As a proposal, here are some steps to build a schedule:
-
Define the project scope.
-
Build the WBS.
-
Create a sequence of tasks: with the WBS defined, it is easier to sequence tasks. To create this sequence, it is necessary to observe the hierarchy between them, represented in the EAP: which tasks need to be performed first (predecessors), which will be performed later (successors) and which ones can be performed in parallel. It is important to analyse the dependencies that may exist between one activity and another. It is also important to detail the activities so that it is understandable to everyone involved.
-
Define the duration of activities: There are many ways to estimate the duration of an activity. Next, the four main ones are detailed:
-
Estimate by analogy: based on previous experiences, on projects within the organization or on the context or market in which the organization operates. This type of estimate raises parameters from old projects, such as duration, complexity, weight and budget, and then applies them to future projects that have similar characteristics. This is an inaccurate technique.
-
Parametric estimation: is a technique that consists of a relationship between the use of statistics and historical data, calculating the parameter estimate. One of the basic formulas for this type of analysis is the multiplication of the amount of work by the hours of labour for each work unit, that is, a relationship between the number of available employees and the duration of the activity.
-
Expert Opinion: Recruitment and use of the knowledge of professionals who already have experience in the team, or hiring technical and specialized training regarding the type of project that will be developed. These professionals can identify demands and difficulties that other techniques may not cover, allowing for a reduction in the degree of uncertainty in the estimates.
-
Three-point estimation: This type of estimate is improved when estimating uncertainties and risk are considered. The concept originated with PERT (Program Review and Evaluation Technique), developed with the US Department of Defence. This technique uses three scenarios to define an approximate range for the duration of each activity. These scenarios are “most likely”; “optimistic”, and the “pessimistic”. This technique helps to better recognize the parameters that can help define the duration of the activity and its associated risks.
-
-
Assign tasks to those responsible: it is important to establish a person responsible for each activity, so that he is responsible for the execution.
-
Build a schedule: There are many graphical ways to build a schedule, from using post-it notes on a wall, spreadsheets and even management software.
​Ideally, the schedule should be accessible to everyone involved and that the project's progress over time can be viewed by everyone. Among some indications of programs to build a schedule, it is possible to cite the most usual:
-
Excel: Gantt chart templates available for different needs.
-
MS Project
-
Monday.com.
Team and infrastructure
When defining the scope, work breakdown structure, and schedule, the next step involves consolidating responsibilities for meeting activities and deadlines. It is important to remember about the profile of those involved in the formation of the team, considering their diversification, knowledge and skills. Observing these conditions in the composition of teams is essential for good performance and contributes to mitigating the risks associated with the development of projects, especially the most innovative ones.
The assignment of responsibilities must be communicated in an explicit, clear and comprehensive manner. For this, some tools or models to organize these responsibilities may be relevant. Among the usual tools that can understand the main factors for monitoring projects is the 5W2H matrix. This acronym represents questions regarding the key defining elements, which are derived from English, and represent: What (what) should be done? Why (why) should it be implemented? Who (who) is responsible? Where (where) should it be run? When (when) should it be implemented? How (how) should it be conducted? How much will the implementation cost? When organizing the planning through the 5W2H matrix, the attributions and other elements necessary to carry out the activities are evident. It is also a visual and representative way to clarify the objectives of each stage / activities and to analyze possible internal and/or external interferences of the organization.
Another tool that can be useful for visualizing the assignments of team members during project development is the so-called RACI Matrix, also from English, which means: Responsible (Responsible), Authority (Accountable), or Consulted (Consulted) ) and the Informed (Informed). Here are the attributions of the RACI matrix:
-
Responsible: is the individual responsible for the execution, development, completion and delivery of the activity.
-
Authority: refers to the coordinator or person who has the authority to organize the task, carry out follow-up and make the necessary decisions that define the approval and completion of the delivery.
-
Consulted: people who can contribute to improving the development of the activity or improving delivery.
-
Informed: These are people who need to be informed about the beginning and completion of an activity (or a delivery), mainly aimed at those who generate certain changes arising from these activities or deliveries.
The recommendation for the organization of a RACI Matrix is ​​to use a table or matrix and the letter referring to the role/attribution of each person in relation to the activity or delivery. It is noteworthy that, for each activity/delivery, there must be at least one person in charge and one authority, and in the case of “authority”, it is not recommended that it be assigned to more than one person. As for the people to be consulted and/or informed, there is no requirement, however, each matrix will present its respective attributions, according to each project.
​
Considering both tools, 5W2H and the RACI Matrix, it is possible to reconcile the information and make even more evident the role of each person on the team in the development of activities and their deliveries, according to the other elements, especially in the schedule. In addition, to the development of these steps for the good performance of the project, it is important to foresee the need for the infrastructure to carry out the planned steps/activities. Assigning responsibilities to teams and providing the necessary infrastructure will provide an overview of the demands for meeting those deliverables. Thus, together with the team, the available and necessary infrastructure must be part of the planning. Among the items most associated with infrastructure in project management, one can list the availability of personnel, as well as the demand for physical and material resources, such as: equipment, tools, software, high-performance internet access, among others. Certainly, in certain projects, according to defined scope and products, there will be a need for more specific or sophisticated resources, and for that, it is important to define your forecast, including costs and availability of use in the project development time, aiming to guarantee an adequate structure for the execution of the activities foreseen in the plan.
Just as complementary information, to implement the conditions to innovate in the public sector, the creation of innovation laboratories has been encouraged, with the objective of providing a space for people and resources (infrastructure) to be guided towards the creation of experimentation environments in the sector. public. This logic is especially aimed at open and collaborative innovation, involving not only intra-organizational teams, but other external actors in the proposition of innovative projects based on agile methodologies and co-creation. There is no single design or specification for the innovation laboratories, however, these environments have been implemented in the public sector aiming at the development of innovation, from the generation of ideas, construction of prototypes and even its implementation in a controlled scale.
IMPLEMENTATION

The implementation of a project is, essentially, the practical execution of its planning. Therefore, there must be an effective connection between the intended results in the planning and the results obtained in its implementation, particularly when different actors are responsible for the activities of each of these stages. Communication, therefore, is fundamental for the success of the implementation. It must take place through direct channels, so that it is agile and so that its referrals are conducted in a timely manner. Therefore, large hierarchical communication chains need to be avoided at this time, as they do not contribute to this agility of action.
​
​The manager in the Agile approach has enormous responsibility for the project's macro management, that is, in the definition of objectives; organization of resources, staff motivation, communication and development/training of people throughout the planning and development stage of the project. The team, in turn, works in a self-managing way in the micro-management of the project, internally organizing its activities and responsibilities in a collaborative and synergistic way, with autonomy. In the implementation phase, however, responsibility must be shared equally between management and staff. For this to occur, cooperation and respect between individuals are necessary, as it is through them that it will be possible to quickly adjust the project, adapt the changes and meet its consequences, avoiding the extension of any impacts of the project's non-adherence to the real demand at specific points. In this aspect, the participation and engagement of stakeholders is fundamental.
​
​But, above all, it is essential that the teams carefully define an implementation plan that makes it possible to break this step into smaller phases, defining deadlines, necessary resources, assumptions and risks, in addition to delegating their primary responsibilities to those involved in each of the activities in these phases. This will certainly contribute to the timely management of any changes as well as the risks involved in these adjustments. For this, the registration and feedback of the actions taken must also be provided for in the implementation plan, as they serve not only as guidelines for corrective measures during implementation, but also as a history of lessons learned and markers of preventive measures for planning and development of upcoming projects.
​
In general, during the entire project implementation in the agile approach, special attention must be paid to some aspects so that the speed, quality and adherence of each deliverable can be achieved as agreed in the implementation plan. The first is the management of results-residues, that is, results that, in practice, did not return value to the organization, were not desired or that inadvertently demanded a lot of resources. The second aspect is the analysis of implementation failures, in order to identify their causes (for example: lack of time for development, due to inadequate deadlines or excessive changes; lack of understanding of the scope, due to communication problems; insufficient information from lack of stakeholder engagement or rush to development) and mitigate them. The third is the optimization of the implementation flow, with a view to efficiency and quality, timely changing teams, practices and processes, if necessary, and promptly making available tools and resources that can contribute to this efficiency and quality.
​
​Therefore, the implementation should not be carried out improvised, just because the project has already been developed and everything (in theory) has already been done. There are many surprises at this stage for those who think this way. A careful implementation plan is a critical success factor for the projects and also a guarantee of mitigation of unforeseen events, which will potentially occur at this stage. By managing these issues, the plan contributes to the satisfaction of stakeholders, who, above all, want to see their demands and needs effectively met without further complications within the agreed period, in the desired and previously validated form.
FOLLOW UP

Monitoring is essential to achieve the success of projects being implemented. This is because, inevitably, difficulties will arise over time. Thus, without proper follow-up and course corrections, good ideas can get lost along the way. There are two phases that need follow-up and are discussed below: (i) follow-up during implementation and (ii) follow-up after implementation.
​
During implementation, in principle, the team should consider that the planning was correctly carried out and now it is a question of implementing what was planned. Regarding this implementation, there are many aspects that require monitoring, notably: activities, deadlines, cost, scope, quality and people.
​
Activity control forms the basis of project implementation. The activities planned for the implementation of the project must be properly specified, so that everyone understands the steps to be performed and what is planned in each step. Thus, it is possible to scale the work and resources that must be mobilized in each activity. It is important to keep in mind that the list of activities sets the method used to implement the project. It clarifies “how” the project will be implemented. During implementation, for various reasons, changes may be made to this method. Thus, some steps can be deleted, changed or added. This may be necessary to address time, cost or quality issues. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the list of activities up to date and promptly communicate any changes to everyone involved.
​
The control of deadlines is the most evident. The implementation must have its steps defined, including a description of what must be achieved to configure the completion of each step. Thus, it is possible to verify if the project implementation is progressing as planned or if there are delays that could compromise the final deadline. When delays are observed in intermediate steps, corrective actions should be taken as soon as possible. These actions may involve: use of apps or procedures for greater productivity, expansion of hours dedicated to the project, expansion of the project implementation team, outsourcing of secondary activities, or even reduction of scope, if this does not compromise the main objectives of the project.
​
Cost control is the most critical in many cases. Where relevant, project planning should include a sufficiently detailed and accurate financial plan, including inflation or exchange rate effects. Based on this financial plan, it is possible to monitor and observe any deviations. When higher-than-expected costs are observed, corrective actions must be taken as soon as possible. These actions should be aimed at the highest cost items that have the greatest impact on the overall cost of implementation. Initially, the team must understand the main reasons for the increase in cost and whether they can be mitigated or eliminated. If this is not possible, the team can check the possibility of increasing the project budget. If this is not possible, then it will be necessary to reduce project expenses. Depending on the case, this may involve: use of lower cost apps or procedures, reduction in service contracts, reduction in space or equipment rental, replacement of raw materials or consumables, etc.
​
Scope control is one of the leading concerns on many projects. Often, due to incomplete planning, the scope varies throughout the project implementation, and this implies a large additional workload (and rework) for the project team. It can also be the cause for the increase in project deadlines and costs. To avoid scope changes, qualified planning, a clear specification of the scope, and an understanding of this scope shared by all stakeholders is essential. Even with these precautions, in many cases, minor scope adjustments often occur during implementation. In that case, it is important that this is identified and communicated to those involved as soon as possible. In parallel, it must be analysed whether the changes have an impact on deadlines or costs. If this happens, schedule and financial planning must be updated and communicated to those involved.
​
Quality control is often the subtlest control. It involves identifying whether what is being done will meet stakeholders' quality expectations. This expectation is often subjective. Thus, quality control requires continued contact with stakeholders, so that they can observe, criticize and approve what is being done. An additional difficulty is that, many times, the final product or object of the project does not appear during the implementation, but only in its final phases. In any case, continued contact with stakeholders, gathering feedback on the various aspects of the project, is what will allow the project team a clear understanding of the expected quality standards.
​
Control of people, notably the project implementation team, is another key element. This happens because, in the end, it is these people who will implement the project. Therefore, the previous elements – activities, deadline, cost, scope, quality – depend to a large extent on the project team. Considering human factor aspects, it is necessary to observe: (i) if the coordinator exercises the leadership functions, keeping the team focused on the project activities; (ii) whether the coordinator, or a designated manager, exercise the project control functions, as specified above; (iii) whether project team members have the technical knowledge and teamwork skills necessary for implementation, and (iv) whether the team is motivated to carry out the tasks. As always, if there are problems in some of these items, actions should be taken as soon as possible to ensure good performance, harmonious interaction and team productivity.
​
In addition to the controls indicated above, related to the project implementation phase, some authors also cite risk control. Here, the recommendation is to maintain control of risks associated with the other controls mentioned above, as shown in the table here. Visualizing the risks involved in each dimension of the project allows contingency actions to be planned and taken, reducing the probability of problems throughout the project.
​
The previous paragraphs discussed the necessary follow-up during project implementation. Next, we will present the elements that must be considered after the project is implemented. It is worth noting that there are two types of projects: (i) those that finish along with its implementation (for example, an event program) and (ii) those that deliver a product that will be used after implementation (for example, a new service which is now offered to the population). In this second case, from the stakeholders' point of view, the post-implementation phase is the most important, where the benefits of the project will be experienced. The comments that follow refer to projects of this type. Projects are implemented to generate benefits to stakeholders. Thus, after project implementation, it is important to assess whether it is effectively generating the benefits that were originally foreseen. In this sense, result indicators must be established. These indicators must meet some characteristics listed below:
-
Relevance – the indicator should be aligned with the project's objectives and reveal whether these objectives are being achieved;
-
Comprehension – the indicator must be understood by all stakeholders, without the need for longer or complex explanations;
-
Ease – the indicator should be relatively easy to collect and calculate, without mobilizing substantial time or effort from those responsible;
-
Timeliness - the indicator must be updatable in relatively short periods, so that the interval between the occurrence of events and the update of the indicator is short (for example, values that can be updated monthly are preferable to values that can only be updated annually).
​
Many public projects are designed to directly serve citizens. In this environment, service capacity, service time and service quality are always relevant. The table here presents some examples of indicators frequently used in the public service, emphasizing their alignment with the project's objectives.
​
Thus, post-implementation follow-up should focus on established result indicators. Ideally, the follow-up should be done using a physical or virtual board, following the precepts of Vista Management. This allows those involved to quickly view deviations. The figures here present two situations, where, in the first one, results follow the forecast. There are some fluctuations, as is natural in all processes, but, on average, results follow the forecast. On the other hand, in the second figure, results are clearly below expectations.
​
In cases where the results do not meet the expectations, whenever possible, corrective actions must be taken. In the case of the second figure, actions are needed from the seventh or eighth month, when deviations from the forecast start to accumulate. Considering the case of a new service offered to citizens, these actions may involve, for example, expanding the communication of the service offered, strengthening the capacity (or training) of the service team, or even redesigning parts of the service offered. When necessary, this redesign can be done as part of the routine of the entity responsible for providing the service or it can be the object of a new project to improve or expand the offer of services.
​
Monitoring projects after implementation, supported by result indicators, is always important, either to: (i) correct the course through appropriate actions in each case or (ii) use the documented results as a subsidy for proposing new projects that can continually improve the public service.